A concerned citizens initiative now cosponsored by the AAAS, the Council on Competitiveness, the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine, and signed by over 175 leading American universities and other organizations, representing over 125 million Americans.      Join us.


 


Is America Losing its Competitive Edge?    A Presidential Debate
on Science and America’s Future 

 

"Given the many urgent scientific and technological challenges facing America and the rest of the world, the increasing need for accurate scientific information in political decision making, and the vital role scientific innovation plays in spurring economic growth and competitiveness, we call for a public debate in which the U.S. presidential candidates share their views on the issues of The Environment, Health and Medicine, and Science and Technology Policy."

  See signers

invitation3-button

invitation2-button

the invitation


Science Debate 2008 on Charlie Rose




 

"For the last 60 years, science and engineering have been responsible for half the growth in the U.S. economy. But some reports suggest that by 2010 90% of all scientists and engineers will live in Asia.  Asian countries are now graduating 10 times the number of scientists and engineers the U.S. is.  Do the candidates have a plan to keep the American economy strong and to tackle America's major challenges like climate change, energy security, education and healthcare - all of which revolve around science?  Who really deserves your vote?"

-Shawn Lawrence Otto
CEO, Science Debate 2008

 

Why Clinton, McCain & Obama have a moral obligation to debate these issues

Get the Flash Player to see this player.

This text will be replaced
More information on the Franklin Institute "We Built It" event



Young people: download "It's your life" poster here


"This is not a niche debate, the future economic success of the United States depends on out-performing the competition with smart people and smart ideas. Without the best education system and aggressive investments in basic research and development we will become a second rate economic power. We hope the candidates for president take this very seriously."

-Craig Barrett
Chairman, Intel

 


npr_logo LISTEN                               TELL A FRIEND 

We make the call on NPR's Talk of the Nation: Science Friday

 

earth & sky radio logo  LISTEN    4/12/08: UPDATE

The debate and why it's important on Earth & Sky radio 

 

inoculated mind logo  LISTEN

Sheril Kirshenbaum on the debate on The Inoculated Mind 

 

 

in their own words button

See what some of our signers have to say about why this matters 

 

 

Leaders & Nobelists: why this matters

video button 




"Imagine if the candidates had said at the start of the debate season: 'We will have debates, but we will not discuss in any detail our policies toward pollution of air and water, climate change, renewable energy research, global diseases and pandemics, bioethical issues such as stem cell research, how to use scientific innovation to stimulate economic growth, how to improve science education, and how to regain scientific integrity in government.' Had they said this, there would have been a public outcry - and yet this is what has happened. In no debate so far have any of these vital issues been discussed in depth. None. We believe the voters have a right to hear these issues discussed, and the candidates have a responsibility to discuss them."

-Matthew Chapman
President, Science Debate 2008




The Grand Challenges for Engineering

Get the Flash Player to see this player.

This text will be replaced






Click for the AAAS site on what is known of the candidates' positions so far:
AAAS report on candidates' positions